Complex of mutualistic microbes designed to increase plant productivity

ABSTRACT

The present disclosure provides agricultural compositions and methods of using these compositions to increase plant growth, pathogen resistance and drought tolerance. The agricultural compositions disclosed herein comprise mixtures of mutualistic beneficial fungi such as  Laccaria bicolor  and Piriformispora  indica , and bacterial strains of  Pseudomonas.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/854,154, filed Apr. 21, 2020, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/334,793, filed Oct. 26, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,660,340, which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/246,394, filed Oct. 26, 2015, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/294,048, filed Feb. 11, 2016, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

This invention was made with government support under Prime Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.

BACKGROUND ART

The majority of terrestrial plants live in association with symbiotic microorganisms, such as fungi which facilitate their access to soil nutrients. The ectomycorrhizal (ECM) symbiosis is the most common association in forest under boreal and temperate climates. Plants harbor a diverse array of asymptomatic fungal foliar and root endosymbionts and have been recovered from all examined plant taxa to date. Several native endophytic and mycorrhizal fungi have been isolated and characterized as promoter of plant host growth and productivity. Concomitantly native bacterial isolates having a plant growth promoting effect and enhancing the fungal-plant beneficial interaction have been characterized as well.

Populus is a dominant perennial component of temperate forests having the broadest geographic distribution of any North American tree genus, and is a woody perennial model with high value in pulp, paper and biofuel industries. Populus is cultivated worldwide for pulp and paper, veneer, packing material, engineered wood products (e.g., oriented strand board), lumber, and has recently emerged as the preeminent fast-growing woody crop for bioenergy research. Populus can be grown on economically marginal agricultural land thereby minimizing the competition between food and fuel production. Moreover, Populus is known to associate with a wide variety of root symbiotic microbes. Populus is also one of the few plants known to be colonized by both endo- and ectomycorrhizal fungi, making it a unique model system for the study of interactions between plants and microorganisms.

Corn (Zea mays, also known as maize) is the most widely grown grain crop throughout the Americas, and a food crop model for bioethanol production in the United States.

The symbiotic fungus Laccaria bicolor is a member of Hydnangiaceae (Basidiomycota, Agaricomycotina, Agaricomycetes, Agaricomycetidae, Agaricales), a large family of ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic basidiomycetes. Piriformospora indica (Hymenomycetes, Basidiomycota) is a cultivable endophyte that colonizes roots.

The symbiotic fungus Hebeloma is a member of Hymenogastraceae (Basidiomycota, Agaricomycotina, Agaricomycetes, Agaricales, Hymenogastraceae), a large family of ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic basidiomycetes with a wide range of tree-hosts, and can be found in most woodland ecosystems worldwide. The symbiotic fungus Cenoccocum is an ascomycetous fungus placed into the Dothideomycetes, where it represents the only known ectomycorrhizal species within this large and ecologically diverse class of Ascomycota. It is one of the most common and globally abundant genera of ectomycorrhizal fungi, forming black ectomycorrhizas with darkly pigmented hyphae. It has a broad host- and habitat range.

Microbial pathogens, like Atractiella (Atr) and Neonectria, are detrimental to plant growth. Effective and eco-friendly ways are needed to combat pathogenic microorganisms. Currently the chemical compounds to combat pathogens are also damaging to the environment and possibly human health. The current invention offers a solution with a composition made up of benign and natural microorganisms.

Another important aspect of plant growth is the ability to adapt to arid or drought conditions, which is a trait known as drought tolerance/resistance. Arid conditions can lower the yield of many crops, causing great financial losses. Therefore, methods to increase drought tolerance/resistance in plants are needed. The symbiotic microorganism compositions disclosed herein help plants tolerate dry conditions better.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 . Root colonization rates of different L. bicolor strains on different Poplar genotypes. Different Poplar genotypes (particularly poplar genotype 52 225 (P. deltoides), poplar genotype D124 (hybrid TXD), poplar genotype ILL 101 (hybrid TXD) and poplar genotype 93 968 (P. trichocarpa) were treated with various L. bicolor strains (particularly Lb 445.79, Lb 559.96, Lb 594.96, Lb 560.89, Lb 669.97, Lb 561.97, and Lb S238N) and root colonization percent was measured. In each group of bars in the Figure, from left to right, are poplar genotype 52 225 (P. deltoides), poplar genotype D124 (hybrid TXD), poplar genotype ILL 101 (hybrid TXD) and poplar genotype 93 968 (P. trichocarpa). Each group of poplar genotypes were treated with L. bicolor strains, from left to right, Lb 445.79, Lb 559.96, Lb 594.96, Lb 560.89, Lb 669.97, Lb 561.97, and Lb S238N. Lb S238N gave superior root colonization across all poplar genotypes tested.

FIG. 2 . Pseudomonas strain GM41 enhances plant growth when given with different L. bicolor strains. Populus trichocarpa was incubated either with different L. bicolor strains alone (particularly Lb 445.79, Lb 559.96, Lb 594.96, Lb 560.89, Lb 669.97, Lb 561.97, or Lb S238N) (left, labeled a-g) or in combination with Pseudomonas fluorescens strain GM41 (right, labeled a-g). Addition of GM41 significantly enhances the above-ground fresh biomass of P. trichocarpa.

FIG. 3 . Biomass production of corn plants treated with pathogenic or beneficial fungi. Bars from left to right represent biomasses of corn plants treated with Atractiella (Atr), Atractiella and P. indica (Pir), Atractiella and L. bicolor (Lac), Atractiella and P. indica (Pir) and L. bicolor (Lac), Control, and finally Neonectria. Control means not fungal inoculation occurred; Atractiella (Atr) and Neonectria are pathogenic to corn, while P. indica (Pir) and L. bicolor (Lac) significantly increase total plant biomass (roots and shoots) they also appear to rescue plants from colonization by a pathogenic fungus.

FIG. 4 . Metabolites affected by beneficial fungi Lac and Pir. Potential causal mechanisms for results found in FIG. 2 are identified in this table. When both Lac and Pir are present in combination with the pathogen metabolites responsible for increase pest resistance are up-regulated compared to control treatments. Interestingly these inhibitory metabolites are also involved in pathways leading to herbivore resistance and/or deterrence.

FIG. 5 . Corn growth in growth chamber, responding to inoculation with pathogenic or mutualistic fungi. Pathogenic fungal inoculations on left hand side of picture; mutualistic inoculation treatments on right hand side of picture.

FIG. 6 . Poplar growth in response to commensalistic, mutualistic, and pathogenic (antagonistic) fungi under greenhouse conditions. Plants treated with commensalistic, mutualistic or pathogenic fungi are grown in the green house. Plants are randomly arranged.

FIGS. 7A-7C. Effects of microbial inoculants in Populus grown over 3 months under well watered- and water-stressed (−1 MPa) conditions. P: Populus control plant; B: helper bacteria (Pseudomonas), F: fungus Laccaria. Experiments have been performed using 4 replicates of inoculated non-inoculated Populus cuttings (ANOVA p<0.05); a are significantly different, b are significantly different. FIG. 7A shows plant heights, FIG. 7B shows above-ground fresh biomass, and FIG. 7C shows total leaf area of the Populus plants under different treatments.

FIG. 8 . Germination frequency of corn kernel in greenhouse. In each group of bars in the figure are observed percent germination frequency (left) and expected germination frequency (right) of corn kernels. C: control (no inoculation); LP: inoculation with Laccaria bicolor and Piriformispora indica; P: inoculation with Piriformispora indica; L: inoculation with Laccaria bicolor. * Significantly different ANOVA P<0.05.

FIG. 9 . Aboveground biomass of corn grown after 6-weeks growth in greenhouse. The bars in the Figure, from left to right, are C: control no inoculation; P: inoculation with Piriformispora indica; L: inoculation with Laccaria bicolor; LP: inoculation with Laccaria bicolor and Piriformispora indica.

FIG. 10 . Germination frequency of corn kernel in field. In each group of bars in the figure are observed percent germination frequency (left) and expected germination frequency (right) of corn kernels. SAFE—No N: inoculation with Laccaria bicolor, Piriformispora indica and no nitrogen fertilization; SAFE—½N: inoculation with Laccaria bicolor, Piriformispora indica and nitrogen fertilization during half of the growing season; SAFE—Full N: inoculation with Laccaria bicolor, Piriformispora indica and nitrogen fertilization during the full growing season; Buffer zones: no inoculation and no nitrogen fertilization.

FIG. 11 . Average content of phosphorus, ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen in the soil (mg/kg) inoculated with SAFE microbial mix with no nitrogen fertilization. Phosphorus (P) (first bar in each group), ammonia nitrogen (NH4-N) (second bar in each group) and nitrate nitrogen (NO₃—N) (third bar in each group) were measured 1: Before planting (June); 2: During the growing season (August); and 3: At harvest (September). The concentrations are measured in mg/kg.

FIG. 12 . Average height of corn plant (cm) at the end of the growing season in field. No SAFE No N: no inoculation with SAFE microbial mix (L. bicolor and P. indica) and no nitrogen-fertilization (the first bar in the figure); SAFE No N: inoculation with SAFE microbial mix (L. bicolor and P. indica) and no nitrogen-fertilization (the second bar in the figure); No SAFE+N: no inoculation with SAFE microbial mix (L. bicolor and P. indica) and nitrogen-fertilization (the third bar in the figure); SAFE+N: inoculation with SAFE microbial mix (L. bicolor and P. indica) and nitrogen-fertilization (the fourth bar in the figure).

FIG. 13A-13B. Photos of the corn experimental field deployment. A: Planting in June B: At harvest in September of the same year.

FIG. 14A-14I: Effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41 on the growth of Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1 in in vitro co-cultures. P. fluorescens GM41 co-culture has a positive effect on the growth of the three fungi included in the PMB microbial mixture. FIG. 14A: Photo of in vitro cultured L. bicolor S238N; FIG. 14B: Diameter of L. bicolor S238N colonies cultured with (top curve) or without (bottom curve) GM41; FIG. 14C: Fungal dry weight of L. bicolor S238N cultured with (top curve) or without GM41 (bottom curve); FIG. 14D: Photo of in vitro cultured Cenococcum PMI1; FIG. 14E: Diameter of Cenococcum PMI1 colonies cultured with (top curve) or without (bottom curve) GM41; FIG. 14F: Fungal dry weight of Cenococcum PMI1 cultured with (top curve) or without (bottom curve) GM41; FIG. 14G: Photo of in vitro cultured Hebeloma spp. PMI1; FIG. 14H: Diameter of Hebeloma spp. PMI1 colonies cultured with (top curve) or without (bottom curve) GM41; FIG. 14I: Fungal dry weight of Hebeloma spp. PMI1 cultured with (top curve) or without (bottom curve) GM41.

FIG. 15 . Effects of microbial inoculants in Populus tremula×P. alba grown over 3 months in greenhouse. In each group of bars in the figure are, from left to right, aboveground fresh biomass, stem fresh biomass and leaf fresh biomass. P: Populus control plant; B: helper bacteria (Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41), F: fungal mixture of Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1. Experiments were performed using 4 replicates of inoculated or non-inoculated Populus cuttings; * significantly different ANOVA p<0.05

FIG. 16 . Effects of microbial inoculants on the total leaf area in Populus tremula×P. alba grown over 3 months in greenhouse. P: Populus control plant; B: helper bacteria (Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41), F: fungal mixture of Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1. Experiments were performed using 4 replicates of inoculated or non-inoculated Populus cuttings; * significantly different ANOVA p<0.05

FIG. 17 . Effects of SAFE inoculant on the aboveground biomass of Populus trichocarpa and P. deltoides under well-watered- and drought (−0.5 to −1 MPa) conditions over 3 months in greenhouse. In each group of bars, from left to right, are Pt: P. trichocarpa; Pd: P. deltoides; Pt+SAFE: mixture of P. trichocarpa and Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41, Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1. Pd+SAFE: mixture of P. deltoides and Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41, Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1. The group of bars on the left represent plants grown under well-watered conditions, and the group of bars on the right represent plants grown under drought conditions. Experiments were performed using 4 replicates of inoculated or non-inoculated Populus cuttings; *, ** significantly different ANOVA p<0.05.

FIG. 18 . Effects of SAFE inoculant on the total leaf area of Populus trichocarpa and P. deltoides under well-watered- and drought (−0.5 to −1 MPa) conditions over 3 months in greenhouse. In each group of bars are, from left to right, Pt: P. trichocarpa; Pd: P. deltoides; Pt+SAFE: mixture of P. trichocarpa and Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41, Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1. Pd+SAFE: mixture of P. deltoides and Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41, Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1. The group of bars on the left represent plants grown under well-watered conditions, and the group of bars on the right represent plants grown under drought conditions. Experiments were performed using 4 replicates of inoculated or non-inoculated Populus cuttings; *, ** significantly different ANOVA p<0.05.

FIG. 19 . Effects of SAFE inoculant on the fresh root biomass of Populus trichocarpa and P. deltoides under well-watered- and drought (−0.5 to −1 MPa) conditions over 3 months in greenhouse. In each group of bars are, from left to right, Pt: P. trichocarpa; Pd: P. deltoides; Pt+SAFE: mixture of P. trichocarpa and Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41, Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1. Pd+SAFE: mixture of P. deltoides and Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41, Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1. The group of bars on the left represent plants grown under well-watered conditions, and the group of bars on the right represent plants grown under drought conditions. Experiments were performed using 4 replicates of inoculated or non-inoculated Populus cuttings; *, ** significantly different ANOVA p<0.05.

FIG. 20A-20B. Effects of SAFE inoculant on the Superoxide radical content of leaves (FIG. 20A) and roots (FIG. 20B) in Populus trichocarpa and P. deltoides under well-watered- and drought (−0.5 to −1 MPa) conditions over 3 months in greenhouse. W: well-watered condition; D: drought condition. SAFE: mixture of Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41, Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1. Experiments were performed using 4 replicates of inoculated or non-inoculated Populus cuttings; *, ** significantly different ANOVA p<0.05.

FIG. 21 . Effects of SAFE inoculant on the Superoxide Oxide Dismutase (SOD) activity of leaves in Populus trichocarpa and P. deltoides under well-watered- and drought (−0.5 to −1 MPa) conditions over 3 months in greenhouse. W: well-watered condition; D: drought condition. SAFE: mixture of Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41, Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1. Experiments were performed using 4 replicates of inoculated or non-inoculated Populus cuttings; *, ** significantly different ANOVA p<0.05.

FIG. 22 . Effects of SAFE inoculant on the Peroxidase (POD) activity of leaves in Populus trichocarpa and P. deltoides under well-watered- and drought (−0.5 to −1 MPa) conditions over 3 months in greenhouse. W: well-watered condition; D: drought condition. SAFE: mixture of Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41, Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1. Experiments were performed using 4 replicates of inoculated or non-inoculated Populus cuttings; *, ** significantly different ANOVA p<0.05.

FIG. 23 . Effects of SAFE inoculant on the proline content of leaves in Populus trichocarpa and P. deltoides under well-watered- and drought (−0.5 to −1 MPa) conditions over 3 months in greenhouse. W: well-watered condition; D: drought condition. SAFE: mixture of Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41, Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1. Experiments were performed using 4 replicates of inoculated or non-inoculated Populus cuttings; *, ** significantly different ANOVA p<0.05.

FIG. 24A-24B. Field deployment with or without SAFE inoculation of GreenWood Resources, Inc. commercial genotypes of Populus in Westport, OR. A: beginning of the growing season in April; B: end of the growing season in October of the same year.

FIG. 25A-25B. Plant size (FIG. 25A) and survival (FIG. 25B) after one month of growth in field with or without SAFE inoculation. A total of 60 inoculated and 60 non-inoculated plants have been used for statistical analyses. FIG. 25A represents plant size after one month of growth in field with (left bar) and without (right bar) SAFE microbial mixture. FIG. 25B represents survival of the plants to natural pathogens after one month of growth in field with (left bar) and without (right bar) SAFE microbial mixture.

FIG. 26 . Plant height (in inch) after four months of growth in field with or without SAFE inoculation. The first bar (solid) in each group represents a Populus plant inoculated with SAFE mixture (S) and the second bar (empty) in each group represents a Populus plant that is not inoculated with SAFE mixture (NS). A total of 60 inoculated and 60 non-inoculated plants have been used for statistical analyses. Experiments were performed using 12 replicates of inoculated or non-inoculated Populus cuttings of 5 commercial genotypes from GreenWood Resources, Inc; *, ** significantly different ANOVA p<0.05.

FIG. 27 . Stem diameter (in mm) of Populus plants after four months of growth in field with or without SAFE inoculation. The first bar in each group represents a Populus plant inoculated with SAFE mixture (S), and the second bar in each group represents a Populus plant that is not inoculated with SAFE mixture (NS). A total of 60 inoculated and 60 non-inoculated plants were used for statistical analyses. Experiments were performed using 12 replicates of inoculated or non-inoculated Populus cuttings of 5 commercial genotypes from GreenWood Resources, Inc; *, ** significantly different ANOVA p<0.05.

FIG. 28 . Root colonization rate by in situ soil microbes (and SAFE microbes when inoculated). The first bar in each group represents a Populus plant inoculated with SAFE mixture (S) and the second bar in each group represents a Populus plant that is not inoculated with SAFE mixture (NS). A total of 60 inoculated and 60 non-inoculated plants were used for statistical analyses. Experiments were performed using 12 replicates of inoculated or non-inoculated Populus cuttings of 5 commercial genotypes from GreenWood Resources, Inc; *, ** significantly different ANOVA p<0.05.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Both fungal and bacterial isolates have a wide geographic and plant host species distribution. So far only a few studies have examined the role of constructed microbial communities for plants. However, these studies lacked data on constructed microbial communities on woody hosts. These studies have also failed to identify mechanisms that are critical to produce stable, scalable, mutualistic outcomes. Most research to-date on utilization of mutualistic symbiotum to increase crop fitness has a poor field-trial record. One possible explanation for the failure in the field is that most past research has focused on a single species of a mutualistic organism in the field and it is possible that a single microorganism may not be able to compete with the resident microorganisms in the heterogeneous environment of the soil. Research into utilization of complex, constructed microbial communities to increase not only plant host yields but also the efficacy of this approach in a diversity of hosts and geographic contexts, is almost non-existent.

The present inventors have investigated the impact of a constructed multiple-microbial member community (hereinafter “proprietary microbial blend” or “PMB” or “PMB mixture” or “SAFE mixture”) on poplar and corn growth and found significantly higher biomass yields at the greenhouse scale relative to controls not exposed to the constructed microbial community. PMB is a microbial composition including at least two beneficial fungi, or a mixture of one or more beneficial fungi with bacteria that have been categorized as Mycorrhiza Helper Bacteria (MHB), such as strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens. The presence of more than one beneficial microorganism helps establish the beneficial endo- or ectomycorrhizal (ECM) symbiosis when the beneficial microorganisms cooperate, and also provides redundancy in many different contexts, for example, where a single beneficial microorganism may be competed out by resident microorganisms in the soil.

PMB can be formulated as liquid or solid formulations (such as granulated or powdered pellets, or prills), as well as in slow or controlled release formulations. In solid formulations, PMBs can include binding agents such as pullulan, paraffin, pitch or calcium nitrate.

There are many pathogenic microorganisms in the soil, and when a plant is infected with a pathogen, the growth of the plant is blunted. Pathogens cause a decline in plant biomass production and crop yield. The present inventors discovered that PMB that contains at least two beneficial fungi, such as L. bicolor and P. indica, can prevent pathogen-induced growth suppression (FIG. 3 ). Some embodiments of the PMB further contain at least one additional other beneficial fungal strain, such as Hebeloma spp. and Cenoccocum spp. Combination of beneficial fungi in PMB provides redundancy to the microbial blend and makes it useful in different soil conditions and with different plant varieties.

The inventors have also discovered that PMB induces beneficial changes in host plant metabolite profile, which, without being bound in any one theory, may explain the increased pest and pathogen resistance by the host plant (FIG. 4 ).

The inventors have also reported several Pseudomonas fluorescens strains, including isolates GM21, GM25, GM30, GM48, GM49, GM50, GM55, GM60, GM67, GM74, GM78, GM79, GM80, GM84, GM102, GM18 and GM41, that display mycorrhizal helper effect when used with beneficial fungi. Among all the strains, GM41 showed the most beneficial effect. Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41 strain was deposited at the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, 10801 University Boulevard, Manassas, VA 20110 USA) on Jan. 20, 2016. The deposit was made under the terms of the Budapest Treaty. GM41 has been assigned the Accession number PTA-122788.

The inventors have observed that, in combination with a mycorrhizal fungal strain such as L. bicolor, GM41 enhances the beneficial effect the fungal strain has on plant, further increasing plant yield and stress tolerance (FIG. 7A-7D).

Therefore, this disclosure provides compositions comprising PMB and methods of using PMB for improving resistance to pests, increasing plant yields (biomass and fruit/grain), and improving resistance/tolerance to abiotic stresses such as salt and drought.

In one aspect, this disclosure provides compositions useful for promoting plant growth and improving plant resistance to pests and to stress conditions.

To prepare the compositions of this disclosure, fungal inocula can be prepared in 1 L of sterile soil or 1 L of millet. After total fungal growth (i.e., growth to saturation), a fungal inoculum of 1 L is obtained. This inoculum is mixed with a plant soil to obtain a final soil used to grow plants. The term “volume to volume” refers to a ratio of the volume of an inoculum to the volume of final soil; e.g., 1 L inoculum soil with 9 L of plant soil makes 10% volume to volume. For field applications, 5 to 20% volume to volume (i.e., volume of inoculum soil vs. volume of final soil) is generally used, which is equivalent to 1 L to 4 L of fungal inoculum/m² of final soil. The final concentration range of fungi in the final soil is generally 5 to 20 fungal cells/g of final soil.

In another embodiment, fungal inocula can be prepared in 1 L of culture media (e.g., potato dextrose broth). After total fungal growth (i.e., growth to saturation), liquid culture are mixed with sterile water to until a concentration of 50 cells (per fungal species)/ml. This final fungal solution is mixed along with an alginic acid/alginate solution (10 grams/Liter). This mixture can either 1) be poured into a 100 g/L—CaCl₂ solution with a burette and dropped as small pellets (˜5 mm) to encapsulate the fungal solution in alginate beads; or 2) be poured on granulates or soil beads then transferred to a 100 g/L—CaCl₂ solution to coat the fungal solution on the granulates or soil beads. The final concentration range of fungi in the final soil is generally 5 to 20 fungal cells/g of final soil.

In another embodiment, 5 ml of a liquid bacterial culture at a concentration of 1×10²-1.6×10⁶ CFU/ml can be applied per L of final soil or culture media containing fungi as described above. For example, if the total soil volume is 10 L (1 L fungal inoculum+9 L of final soil), 50 ml of a liquid bacterial culture can be added to the soil.

In yet another embodiment, bacteria and fungi can be co-cultured in the same inoculum soil.

In one embodiment, a composition includes a mixture of a L. bicolor strain and a P. indica strain. In some embodiments, the composition comprises a mixture of a L. bicolor strain and a P. indica strain at about 100 total fungal cells per gram of the composition, or about 100 fungal cells per strain per gram of the composition. The term “about 100” refers to any number falling within the range of 85-115, i.e., including 85, 90, 95, 100, 105, 110 and 115. In one specific embodiment, the L. bicolor is of the strain S238N.

In another embodiment, a composition includes a mixture of a L. bicolor strain and a P. indica strain, and further includes a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens. In specific embodiments, the composition includes between 1×10² CFU and 1.6×10⁶ CFU bacterial cells per milliliter of the composition. In a particular embodiment, the composition includes a mixture of a L. bicolor strain and a P. indica strain, and a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens at 5×10² CFU/mL of the composition. In some embodiments, the strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens is selected from one of the following isolates: GM21, GM25, GM30, GM48, GM49, GM50, GM55, GM60, GM67, GM74, GM78, GM79, GM80, GM84, GM102, GM18, and pGM41. In a specific embodiment, the strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens is GM41.

In still another embodiment, a composition includes a mixture of L. bicolor strain and a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens. In specific embodiments, the composition includes a mixture of a L. bicolor strain at about 100 fungal cells per gram of the composition and a liquid bacterial inoculum between 1×10² CFU/mL and 1.6×10⁶ CFU/mL. In a specific embodiment, the composition includes 5×10² CFU/mL of a Pseudomonas fluorescens strain. In a specific embodiment, the strain of L. bicolor is S238N and the strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens is selected from one of the following isolates: GM21, GM25, GM30, GM48, GM49, GM50, GM55, GM60, GM67, GM74, GM78, GM79, GM80, GM84, GM102, GM18 and GM41. In a specific embodiment, the strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens is GM41.

In another embodiment, a composition includes a mixture of a L. bicolor strain, a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens and a strain of Cenoccocum spp. In specific embodiments, the composition includes a mixture of a L. bicolor strain at about 100 fungal cells per gram of the composition, a Cenoccocum spp. strain at about 100 fungal cells per gram of the composition and a liquid bacterial inoculum between 1×10² CFU/mL and 1.6×10⁶ CFU/mL. In a specific embodiment, the composition includes 5×10² CFU/mL of a Pseudomonas fluorescens strain. In a specific embodiment, the strain of L. bicolor is S238N and the strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens is selected from one of the following isolates: GM21, GM25, GM30, GM48, GM49, GM50, GM55, GM60, GM67, GM74, GM78, GM79, GM80, GM84, GM102, GM18 and GM41. In a specific embodiment, the strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens is GM41. In a specific embodiment, the strain of Cenoccocum spp. is PMI1.

In even yet another embodiment, a composition includes a mixture of a L. bicolor strain, a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens, a strain of Cenoccocum spp. and a strain of Hebeloma spp. In specific embodiments, the composition includes a mixture of a L. bicolor strain at about 100 fungal cells per gram of the composition, a Hebeloma spp. strain at about 100 fungal cells per gram of the composition, a Cenoccocum spp. strain at about 100 fungal cells per gram of the composition and a liquid bacterial inoculum between 1×10² CFU/mL and 1.6×10⁶ CFU/mL. In a specific embodiment, the composition includes 5×10² CFU/mL of a Pseudomonas fluorescens strain. In a specific embodiment, the strain of L. bicolor is S238N and the strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens is selected from one of the following isolates: GM21, GM25, GM30, GM48, GM49, GM50, GM55, GM60, GM67, GM74, GM78, GM79, GM80, GM84, GM102, GM18 and GM41. In a specific embodiment, the strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens is GM41. In a specific embodiment, the strain of Hebeloma spp. is PMI1. In a specific embodiment, the strain of Cenoccocum spp. is PMI1.

In another embodiment, a composition includes a mixture of a L. bicolor strain, a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens and a strain of Hebeloma spp. In specific embodiments, the composition includes a mixture of a L. bicolor strain at about 100 fungal cells per gram of the composition, a Hebeloma spp. strain at about 100 fungal cells per gram of the composition and a liquid bacterial inoculum between 1×10² CFU/mL and 1.6×10⁶ CFU/mL. In a specific embodiment, the composition includes 5×10² CFU/mL of a Pseudomonas fluorescens strain. In a specific embodiment, the strain of L. bicolor is S238N and the strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens is selected from one of the following isolates: GM21, GM25, GM30, GM48, GM49, GM50, GM55, GM60, GM67, GM74, GM78, GM79, GM80, GM84, GM102, GM18 and GM41. In a specific embodiment, the strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens is GM41. In a specific embodiment, the strain of Hebeloma spp. is PMI1.

In yet another embodiment, a composition includes a mixture of a P. indica strain and a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens. In some embodiments, the composition includes a mixture of a P. indica strain at about 100 fungal cells per gram of the composition and a liquid inoculum of a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens at between 1×10² CFU/mL and 1.6×10⁶ CFU/mL. In a specific embodiment, the composition contains 5×10² CFU/mL of a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens. In specific embodiments, the strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens is selected from one of the following isolates GM21, GM25, GM30, GM48, GM49, GM50, GM55, GM60, GM67, GM74, GM78, GM79, GM80, GM84, GM102, GM18, and GM41. In a specific embodiment, the strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens is GM41.

The compositions disclosed herein can include, in addition to the desirable microorganisms, other components suitable for plant growth, including phosphorus and certain trace elements such as copper, iron, manganese, zinc, cobalt, molybdenum, and boron, as oxides or salts containing the elements in the cationic form.

The compositions disclosed herein, if necessary, may also contain additional components suitable for agriculture or fertilizer use, such as a water-soluble material. Suitable water-soluble materials are starch, dextrin, gum arabic, gelatin, casein, glue, methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, hydroxyalkylcellulose, alginic acid, polyvinylalcohol, polyacrylic acid, polyacrylamid, and a modified form thereof substituted partially by hydrophobic radicals in place of hydrophilic radicals. Among these water-soluble materials, starch, dextrin, gum arabic, gelatin, casein, glue, methylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose and hydroxyalkylcellulose are preferred. The additional incorporation of said water-soluble material is optional and the amount to be added is not limited, but is usually up to 50 parts by weight for 100 parts by weight of final composition.

The compositions disclosed herein, if necessary, may also contain a binding agent selected from the group consisting of pullulan, paraffin, pitch and calcium nitrate. The present molded composition may be manufactured by any shaping method; the customary granulation technique, customary compression molding technique or customary extrusion molding technique may be conveniently used.

The compositions disclosed herein can be in solid form, and can also be in liquid form; and can include, in addition to the desirable microorganisms, other components suitable for plant growth, including phosphorus and certain trace elements such as copper, iron, manganese, zinc, cobalt, molybdenum, and boron, as oxides or salts containing the elements in the cationic form in an agriculturally acceptable liquid carrier such as water.

According to the present methods, the soil in a field can be treated with a composition disclosed herein at 1 L/m² to 10 L/m². One specific embodiment treats the soil in the field with 5 L/m² of a composition mixture (i.e. 5 liters of PMB per 1 m² of soil). In some embodiments, a composition containing a fungal inoculum of about 100 fungal cells/gram is applied to a final soil at a 5 to 20% volume to volume ratio (i.e., volume of inoculum soil vs. volume of final soil) to achieve about 5 to 20 fungal cells/gram of the final soil. In other embodiments, a composition additionally contains a bacterial strain at a concentration 1×10² CFU/mL-1.6×10⁶ CFU/mL is applied to a final soil at a 5 to 20% volume to volume dilution.

In another aspect, the disclosure provides methods of treating plants with a microbial composition disclosed herein. The compositions disclosed herein can be applied to a wide array of crops (bioenergy, forage, and food), worldwide and are believed to increase nutrient availability in soils and soil quality, resulting in increased nutrient and moisture uptake by plant roots, leading to increased plant growth.

Example 1: Root Colonization Rates of Different L. bicolor Strains on Different Poplar Genotypes

Materials and Methods: Root Colonization Measurements: The percentage of mycorrhizal colonization, as described by Tagu et al. (Variation in the ability to form ectomycorrhizas in the F progeny of an interspecific poplar (Populus spp.) cross. Mycorrhiza 10:237-240, 2001) was determined three-and-a-half months after inoculation by eight observers. All the observers observed randomly the plants within eight blocks and block after block. Each root system was rinsed with tap water, cut in 1-cm pieces and analyzed under a dissecting microscope. For each root system, 100 apices were randomly examined and assessed as mycorrhizal or non-mycorrhizal.

Different poplar genotypes (particularly poplar genotype 52 225 (P. deltoides), poplar genotype D124 (hybrid TXD), poplar genotype ILL 101 (hybrid TXD) and poplar genotype 93 968 (P. trichocarpa) were treated with various L. bicolor strains (particularly Lb 445.79, Lb 559.96, Lb 594.96, Lb 560.89, Lb 669.97, Lb 561.97, and Lb S238N) and root colonization percent was measured.

Results: Among all the L. bicolor strains, Lb S238N gave better root colonization than all other strains across all poplar genotypes tested (FIG. 1 ).

Example 2: Pseudomononas Strain GM41 Assists L. bicolor in Promoting P. trichocarpa Growth

Materials and Methods: Various L. bicolor strains (particularly Lb 445.79, Lb 559.96, Lb 594.96, Lb 560.89, Lb 669.97, Lb 561.97, and Lb S238N) were applied to P. trichocarpa plants between 5-10% volume ratio alone or in combination with 5 ml/L of Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41 10² CFU/ml. The soil was treated using 5 L/m² of the mixture (i.e. 5 liters of PMB per 1 m² of soil).

Results: GM41 increased the growth of P. trichocarpa plants in combination with all L. bicolor strains tested (FIG. 2 ). Lb S238N strain promoted P. trichocarpa growth the most, both alone and in combination with GM41 (FIG. 2 ).

Example 3: Proprietary Microbial Blend (PMB) Comprising L. bicolor and P. indica Promotes Plant Growth Even in the Presence of Pathogens

Materials and Methods: The dikaryotic mycelium of L. bicolor S238N used in this study was grown and maintained in Petri dishes containing Pachlewski agar medium P5 (Di Battista et al., 1996) and incubated at 25° C. for 3 week.

Experiments have been performed using fungal inocula grown in soil/medium mixture or millet before co-culture with plants. At the time of the co-culture with the plants, sterile potting soil has been mixed Volume to Volume with the fungal inoculum. For example, 5% Volume of inoculum to Volume of soil mixture means that 50 ml of the fungal soil has been mixed with 950 ml of sterile soil to grow the plant.

Results: Application of PMB, comprising a mixture of Piriformispora indica in combination with Laccaria bicolor at 5% volume to volume ratio, equivalent to 1 L/m² of inoculum at a concentration of 5 cells/g final soil, resulted in increased plant growth by corn regardless of present of pathogenic fungus. When pathogen was present in the absence of the mixture, plant growth was severely stunted (see FIG. 3 and FIG. 5 ).

Example 4: Proprietary Microbial Blend (PMB) Treatment Increases Beneficial Metabolite Levels in Plants

Materials and Methods: Metabolite profiling—Individual metabolites were analyzed by metabolite profiling using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Briefly, 50-75 mg of finely ground fresh tissue sample were repeatedly extracted with 2.5 ml of 80% ethanol, with the extracts then combined. A 1 ml aliquot was dried in a nitrogen stream. After dissolving the dried extracts in acetonitrile followed by trimethylsilylation, metabolite profiling was performed by GC-MS, as described elsewhere (Jung H W et al., “Priming in systemic plant immunity”, Science 2009, 324(5923):89-91. Metabolites were identified based on mass spectral fragmentation patterns of electron impact ionization (70 eV) and were quantified using peak areas of a characteristic mass-to-charge (m/z) ratio normalized to the internal standard (sorbitol) recovered and corrected for sample weight. Some of the unidentified metabolites were denoted by their retention time (RT) and key m/z ratio. The metabolite data were presented as fold changes of the transgenic line (average of 3 independent lines with 3 replicates for each line) vs. the average of the controls. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t-test.

Results: Metabolites involved in inhibiting microbes (6-MBOA), and deterring herbivores (HMBOA and DIMBOA) were found to be significantly increased in plants treated with the PMB containing L. bicolor and P. indica strains (FIG. 4 ). This result at least partially explains the growth advantage of plants treated with the PMB.

Example 5: Proprietary Microbial Blend (PMB) Comprising L. bicolor and Pseudomonas Increases Drought Resistance in Populus Plants

Materials and Methods: Testing Drought Tolerance—Experiments have been performed using 4 replicates of inoculated non-inoculated Populus cuttings. Initially, the well-watered Populus plants were stressed to −0.5 MPa, at which time they were re-watered to soil capacity. After the plants have been acclimated with three dry down cycles to −0.5 MPa, the plants were further dried down to a greater stress level of −1.0 MPa.

Results: Application of L. bicolor between 5-10% volume ratio in combination with 5 ml/L of Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41 at 10² CFU/ml resulted in increased plant growth in poplar in regular condition and as well under light drought stress. Application of L. bicolor-GM41 microbial mixture enhances water stress tolerance and a fast recovery from the stress with return of optimal watering conditions (FIGS. 7A-7C).

Example 6: Proprietary Microbial Blend (PMB) Comprising L. bicolor, P. Indica and Pseudomonas Increases the Germination Frequency of Corn Kernel in Greenhouse, but to a Lesser Extent than P. indica Alone

Materials and Methods: Corn plants were treated with the microbial mixture comprising 50 cells/ml of Laccaria bicolor, 50 cells/ml of Piriformispora indica and 1.4 million of CFU/ml Pseudomonas fluorescens strain GM41. Germination frequencies of corn kernels were measured in corn plants with or without PMB inoculation.

Results: Application of L. bicolor, P. indica and P. fluorescens resulted in an increase in germination frequency of corn kernels in a greenhouse setting (FIG. 8 ). However, application of P. indica alone resulted in a greater increase in germination frequency of corn kernels than the microbial mixture (FIG. 8 ).

Example 7: Proprietary Microbial Blend (PMB) Comprising L. bicolor, P. Indica and Pseudomonas Did not Result in an Increase in Aboveground Biomass in Corn Plants

Materials and Methods: Corn plants were treated with the microbial mixture comprising 50 cells/ml of Laccaria bicolor, 50 cells/ml of Piriformispora indica and 1.4 million of CFU/ml Pseudomonas fluorescens strain GM41.

Results: PMB microbial mix (L. bicolor and P. indica) did not significantly increase the aboveground biomass of corn while inoculation compared to control (FIG. 9 ). Interestingly, P. indica alone resulted in a greater increase in aboveground biomass than either L. bicolor or P. indica applied alone (FIG. 9 ).

Example 8: Proprietary Microbial Blend (PMB) Comprising L. bicolor, P. Indica and Pseudomonas Increases the Germination Frequency of Corn Kernel in Field

Materials and Methods: Corn plants were treated with the microbial mixture comprising 50 cells/ml of Laccaria bicolor, 50 cells/ml of Piriformispora indica and 1.4 million of CFU/ml Pseudomonas fluorescens strain GM41.

Results: Application of L. bicolor, P. indica and P. fluorescens (PMB, or SAFE microbial mixture) resulted in an increase in germination frequency of corn kernels in field no Nitrogen (no N), low Nitrogen (low N) or high Nitrogen (high N) fertilization conditions (FIG. 10 ).

Application of L. bicolor, P. indica and P. fluorescens (PMB, or SAFE microbial mixture) with or without nitrogen fertilization resulted in an increase in corn plant height as compared to non-inoculated controls over the period of the growth season (FIG. 12 ).

Example 9: Proprietary Microbial Blend (PMB) Comprising L. bicolor, P. Indica and Pseudomonas Increases the Nutritive Qualities of the Soil

Materials and Methods: Phosphorus, ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen levels were measured in a soil sample treated with PMB, but no nitrogen fertilization throughout the growing season (June through September).

Results: Application of L. bicolor, P. indica and P. fluorescens resulted in an increase in the nutritive qualities of a soil not fertilized with a nitrogen fertilizer as demonstrated by increasing phosphorus, ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen levels (FIG. 11 ) throughout the growing season (June through September) (FIG. 13 ).

Example 10: Pseudomonas fluorescens GM41 Enhances the Growth of Laccaria bicolor, Cenococum Spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma Spp. PMI1 in In Vitro Co-Cultures

Materials and Methods: Colony diameters (cm) and fungal dry weights (g) of the beneficial fungi L. bicolor, Cenoccocum spp. and Hebeloma spp. have been measured with or without co-culturing with P. fluorescens GM41 in vitro.

Results: Co-culturing P. fluorescens GM41 with the beneficial fungi L. bicolor, Cenoccocum spp. and Hebeloma spp. positively affected the growth of the co-cultured fungi (FIG. 14 ).

Example 11: Positive Effects of Microbial Inoculants on Populus tremula×P. alba Growth Over 3 Months in Greenhouse

Materials and Methods: Populus plants (Populus tremula×P. alba species) were inoculated with mutualistic beneficial fungi such as Laccaria bicolor, the natural isolate Hebeloma spp. strain PMI1, the natural isolate of Cenoccocum spp. strain PMI, and Pseudomonas fluorescens strain GM41. The microbial mixture (PMB) used to treat Populus comprised 50 cells/ml of Laccaria bicolor, 50 cells/ml of Hebeloma spp. strain PMI1, 50 cells/ml of Cenoccocum spp. strain PMI1 and 1.4 million CFU/ml Pseudomonas fluorescens strain GM41. After 3 months of growth, aboveground fresh biomass, stem fresh biomass and leaf fresh biomass of the poplar were measured in plants treated with the microbial mixture and in non-treated control plants.

Results: Soil inoculation with PMB comprising P. fluorescens GM41 and/or with the fungal mixture of Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1 stimulated the growth of total aboveground biomass (aboveground, stem and leaf biomass) of Populus as compared to the non-treated control Populus plants (FIG. 15 ).

The leaf area is a major determinant of photosynthesis assessing the growth potential of the plant. Therefore, the inventors wanted to measure the effect of PMB on total leaf area of Populus plants. Total surface area of all leaves per plant (Populus tremula×P. alba) were scanned and measured using WinRhizo/Winfolia scanner and software systems. The PMB microbial mixture (SAFE mixture) comprising P. fluorescens GM41 and/or with the fungal mixture of Laccaria bicolor, Cenococcum spp. PMI1 and Hebeloma spp. PMI1, was found to increase the total leaf surface area increasing then the potential capacity of the plant to produce more biomass as compared to their counterparts not treated with the PMB mixture (FIG. 16 ).

Example 12: PMB (SAFE) Inoculant Increases the Aboveground Biomass of P. Trichocarpa and P. deltoides Under Well-Watered and Drought (−0.5 MPa to −1 MPa) Conditions Over 3 Months in Greenhouse

Materials and Methods: Testing Drought Tolerance—Experiments have been performed using 4 replicates of inoculated non-inoculated Populus cuttings. Initially, the well-watered Populus plants were stressed to −0.5 MPa, at which time they were re-watered to soil capacity. After the plants have been acclimated with three dry down cycles to −0.5 MPa, the plants were further dried down to a greater stress level of −1.0 MPa.

Results: Inoculating different Populus strains with the PMB (aka. SAFE) mixture increased the aboveground biomass in well-watered condition as well as under drought stress in two different other Populus species (P. trichocarpa and P. deltoides) (FIG. 17 ). However, the PMB mixture (SAFE) did not increase the total leaf area in Populus plants under drought stress (FIG. 18 , right bars), whereas it increased under normal (unrestricted) watering conditions (FIG. 18 , left bars).

The inventors also investigated the fresh root biomass of Populus plants under well-watered and drought conditions. Inoculation with PMB increased the growth of fresh biomass in well-watered condition as well as under drought stress (FIG. 19 ). The PMB (SAFE) inoculant allowed the plant biomass increase observed in FIG. 16 by increasing root development and therefore allowing a better water supply under drought stress condition.

Using specific PCR primers, the inventors confirmed the presence, and therefore the persistence of each microbial strain of the PMB mixture (SAFE) in soil and on plant roots after three months.

Example 13: PMB (SAFE) Mixture Protects Populus Plants Against ROS Under Well-Watered and Drought Stress Conditions

To measure possible effects of PMB on the stress caused by radical oxygen species (ROS), the inventors first measured the superoxide content of P. trichocarpa and P. deltoides leaves (FIG. 20A) and roots (FIG. 20B) under normal (well-watered) or stress (drought) conditions as described above. It was found that the superoxide radical content in Populus leaves were higher in drought conditions as well as well watered conditions in PMB (SAFE) mixture treated plants. On the other hand, the superoxide content in the roots were decreased under well-watered condition as well as under drought stress (FIG. 20A and FIG. 20B).

To minimize the damage from Radical Oxygen Species (ROS) plants utilize enzymatic antioxidants such as the Super Oxide Dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD). It was found that both SOD (FIG. 21 ) and POD activity levels (FIG. 21 ) were increased in the leaves of P. trichocarpa and P. deltoides treated with the PMB mixture as compared to controls, under both well-watered and drought (−0.5 MPa to −1 MPa) conditions over 3 months in a greenhouse setting (FIG. 21 and FIG. 22 ).

Another plant defense mechanism against ROS damage is adjusting osmotic pressure by producing an osmoprotectant such as proline. The inventors measured proline levels in Populus leaves to see the effect of PMB in plant osmoprotection. As a result, it was found that inoculation the Populus plants with the PMB (SAFE) mixture in greenhouse increased the proline content in Populus leaves as compared to control plants, particularly under drought stress (FIG. 23 ).

Thus, the PMB (SAFE) inoculation facilitated protection against drought-induced stresses.

Example 14: PMB (SAFE) Positively Affects Plant Size and Survival in Field

Populus plants were planted in a field in Westport, OR (FIG. 24 ), with or without PMB (SAFE) inoculation.

It was observed that plants treated with the microbial mixture grew more in size (FIG. 25A) and better survival percentage (FIG. 25B) than their non-treated counterparts after one month in the field.

After four months in the field, the PMB (SAFE) treated plants were taller (FIG. 26 ), and had a thicker stem (FIG. 27 ) as compared to their non-treated counterparts.

The current inventors have also shown in field that inoculation with the PMB (SAFE) mixture increased Populus root colonization by in situ beneficial microbes (FIG. 28 ). The presence and persistence of each strain of the SAFE microbes were assessed and confirmed on plant roots and surrounding soil by PCR amplification using specific designed PCR primers. 

1.-23. (canceled)
 24. A composition comprising a Piriformispora indica strain and a Pseudomonas fluorescens strain.
 25. The composition of claim 24, wherein said Pseudomonas fluorescens strain is the strain designated as GM41 (ATCC PTA-122788).
 26. The composition of claim 25, wherein said Piriformispora indica strain is present in the composition at about 100 cell per gram and said Pseudomonas is present in the composition at a concentration between 1×10² CFU/mL and 1.6×10⁶ CFU/mL.
 27. The composition of claim 26, wherein said composition is a liquid formulation and further comprises components suitable for plant growth.
 28. The composition of claim 26, wherein said composition is a solid formulation and further comprises components suitable for plant growth.
 29. The composition of claim 28, further comprising a binding agent selected from the group consisting of pullulan, paraffin, pitch and calcium nitrate. 30.-31. (canceled)
 32. A method of promoting plant pathogen resistance comprising treating plants with the composition of claim
 24. 33. (canceled)
 34. The method of claim 32, wherein said Pseudomonas fluorescens strain is the strain designated as GM41 (ATCC PTA-122788).
 35. The method of claim 34, wherein said Piriformispora indica strain is present in the composition at about 100 cell per gram and said Pseudomonas is present in the composition at a concentration between 1×10² CFU/mL and 1.6×10⁶ CFU/mL.
 36. The method of claim 35, wherein said composition is a liquid formulation and further comprises components suitable for plant growth.
 37. The method of claim 35, wherein said composition is a solid formulation and further comprises components suitable for plant growth.
 38. The method of claim 37, further comprising a binding agent selected from the group consisting of pullulan, paraffin, pitch and calcium nitrate. 